Case 2305330/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Shentova v Kuchen Kitchens Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2305330/2021
- Decision date
- 18 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Shentova
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing by video on 29 July 2022, Employment Judge Reed refused the respondent's application to adjourn. After hearing Ms S Shentova in person, the tribunal found her complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages well founded.
The tribunal ordered Kuchen Kitchens Ltd to pay £2,032.25 for unpaid wages for the period 1 August 2021 to 27 August 2021 and £1,238 for unpaid commission on sales made in August 2021. Those sums were awarded gross of tax.
The tribunal also upheld the complaint of a failure to pay compensation for untaken annual leave under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and ordered payment of £914.63. The judgment states that the respondent was responsible for any required income tax and national insurance contributions.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages found well founded; award comprised £2,032.25 for unpaid wages for 1 August 2021 to 27 August 2021 and £1,238 for unpaid commission on sales made in August 2021. | Upheld | — | £3,270 |
| Working time regulations | Complaint of failure to pay compensation for untaken annual leave under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 found well founded. | Upheld | — | £915 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,185
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.