Case 2305355/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Aleksandrov and others v Mealmaker London (Prepared Produce) Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2305355/2019
- Decision date
- 18 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment lists case numbers 2305355/2019, 2305356/2019, 2305357/2019 and 2305359/2010 and states that the claim was struck out. On 6 June 2023 the Tribunal wrote to the claimant giving an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. Employment Judge Khalil therefore struck out the claim on 18 August 2023. The judgment records no substantive merits findings and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. It states that, by letter dated 6 June 2023, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued, but no sufficient representations or hearing request were made. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.