Case 2305373/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Miller v Greggs plc At: London South — 2022
- Case reference
- 2305373/2019
- Decision date
- 9 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Miller
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Notice of Dismissal of Claim issued in the Employment Tribunal on 9 November 2022 by Employment Judge C H O’Rourke. The claimant was Miss M Miller and the respondent was Greggs PLC. The judgment records that the claimant's claims of disability discrimination, unlawful deductions from wages, arrears of holiday pay, and breach of contract in respect of notice were dismissed following her non-compliance with the unless order of 13 September 2022.
The document does not contain findings on the substantive merits of any of the claims. It records a procedural dismissal only, so there is no tribunal determination on liability, no award of compensation, and no split remedy figures for individual claims.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed following the Claimant's non-compliance with the unless order of 13 September 2022; the merits were not determined. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed following the Claimant's non-compliance with the unless order of 13 September 2022; the merits were not determined. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed following the Claimant's non-compliance with the unless order of 13 September 2022; the merits were not determined. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed following the Claimant's non-compliance with the unless order of 13 September 2022; the merits were not determined. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.