Case 2305373/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K. Howe v Fancy Dress ( Crawley) Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2305373/2020
- Decision date
- 25 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smith
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K. Howe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs K. Howe brought claims against Fancy Dress (Crawley) Limited in the London South Employment Tribunal before Employment Judge T R Smith on 25 February 2022. The claimant was represented in person and the respondent by a solicitor. The tribunal recorded that the wrongful dismissal claim, the redundancy payment claim, and the holiday pay claim were dismissed on withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | Claim for non-payment or part payment of a redundancy payment was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for non-payment of holiday pay was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Claim was found well-founded and the tribunal awarded £676.92. The recoupment regulations did not apply. | Upheld | — | £677 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £677
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.