Case 2305374/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Z Huang v Lenslife Technologies Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2305374/2020
- Decision date
- 22 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Z Huang
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21 because Lenslife Technologies Limited did not present a response within the stipulated time. It found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from Mr Z Huang's wages, so the wage claim succeeded.
The judgment ordered the respondent to pay £20,154, expressed as a gross figure and subject to the usual deductions for income tax and National Insurance if those deductions are duly paid to the relevant authorities. It also ordered payment of £725 in unpaid pension contributions. No other claim type, legal test, or remedy head is recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment after the respondent did not present a response within the stipulated time. The award was stated as £20,154 gross plus £725 unpaid pension contributions. | Upheld | — | £20,879 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £20,879
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.