Case 2305393/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Cremin v Maven Global Innovations Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2305393/2019
- Decision date
- 7 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Balogun Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Cremin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr N Cremin was dismissed by reason of redundancy. The tribunal held that he was owed £525 statutory redundancy pay. It also found that his holiday pay claim, brought as an unlawful deduction of wages, was well founded and awarded £1,462.49 in respect of holiday pay.
The tribunal further found that the breach of contract claim was well founded. It awarded £2,633.84 for notice pay and £1,163.74 for unpaid expenses under that claim.
The total sum ordered to be paid to the claimant was £5,785.07. The judgment text does not set out any further reasoning beyond these findings and awards.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and that the respondent owed £525 statutory redundancy pay. | Upheld | — | £525 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was in respect of holiday pay and was found well founded; the respondent owed £1,462.49. | Upheld | — | £1,462 |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract claim was found well founded. The award comprised £2,633.84 for notice pay and £1,163.74 for unpaid expenses. | Upheld | — | £3,798 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,785
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.