Case 2305417/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Carolan v Fine Line Barbers Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2305417/2021
- Decision date
- 15 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McLaren Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Carolan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 20 July 2022, the tribunal gave Mr J Carolan an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that the claim had not been actively pursued and that the claimant had not explained his non-attendance at the hearing on 24 June 2022.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The reasons do not record any substantive determination of the underlying employment claims or any award of compensation.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim type inferred from the GOV.UK listing category; the judgment itself refers only to 'the claim'. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Claim type inferred from the GOV.UK listing category; the judgment itself refers only to 'the claim'. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Claim type inferred from the GOV.UK listing category; the judgment itself refers only to 'the claim'. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.