Case 2305440/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Powell v Vape Cube Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2305440/2021
- Decision date
- 19 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hart REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Powell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Powell succeeded on an unlawful deduction from wages claim. The tribunal found that Vape Cube Ltd failed to pay his wages from 17 August 2021 until 6 September 2021, and ordered the respondent to pay £776.35 gross.
He also succeeded in relation to accrued holiday pay. The tribunal found that the respondent was in breach of contract and in breach of the Working Time Regulations in failing to pay him in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday, and ordered payment of £490.90 gross. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction of wages because the respondent failed to pay wages from 17 August 2021 until 6 September 2021. | Upheld | — | £776 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent was in breach of contract and in breach of the Working Time Regulations in failing to pay the claimant in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday. | Upheld | — | £491 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,267
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.