Case 2305441/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Sidhu v VapeCube Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2305441/2021
- Decision date
- 14 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Balogun Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Sidhu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued letters dated 14 October 2022 and 29 November 2022 giving Mr K Sidhu an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The reasons identified were that he had failed within the time stipulated to make written representations and that the claim was not being actively pursued.
Mr Sidhu did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The extracted judgment does not identify any substantive determination on the underlying claim itself, only the strike out decision.
The judgment was signed by Acting Regional Employment Judge Balogun on 14 December 2022. No remedy was awarded or addressed in the reasons provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment only states that 'the claim is struck out' after the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing. It does not identify the underlying substantive cause of action in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.