Case 2305444/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Styring v Pipe systems Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2305444/2021
- Decision date
- 22 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Styring
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 13 July 2022, the Tribunal gave Mr G Styring an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated bases were that he had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 23 February 2022 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mr Styring did not make written representations, or did not make representations sufficient to explain why the claim should not be struck out, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
The hearing listed for 13 and 14 October 2022 did not take place. The judgment records no substantive determination of the pleaded claims and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not separate the listed claims; it states that the claim was struck out as a whole. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not separate the listed claims; it states that the claim was struck out as a whole. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not separate the listed claims; it states that the claim was struck out as a whole. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.