Case 2305469/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Emily Clarke v Mr Michael Baldry trading as Ennis House Rest Home — 2024
- Case reference
- 2305469/2021
- Decision date
- 29 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Fowell
- Panel members
- Ms M Oates-Hinds, Mr C Rogers
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Emily Clarke
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge E Fowell, sitting with Ms M Oates-Hinds and Mr C Rogers at Croydon by video on 29 and 30 January 2024, found that Mrs Emily Clarke’s dismissal was in breach of contract. The tribunal awarded her a notice payment of £3,080.00 and also found that she was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £3,034.30.
The tribunal further found that the claimant’s dismissal was unfair, but recorded that no additional compensation was due on that claim. The complaint of discrimination on grounds of pregnancy and maternity was dismissed.
The total compensation awarded was £6,114.30, made up of the notice payment and statutory redundancy payment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held that the dismissal was in breach of contract and awarded a notice payment of £3,080.00. | Upheld | — | £3,080 |
| Redundancy | The claimant was found entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £3,034.30. | Upheld | — | £3,034 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal was unfair, but recorded that no additional compensation was due for that claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The complaint of discrimination on grounds of pregnancy and maternity was dismissed. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,114
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.