Case 2305472/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Owen (Non-legal Adviser) For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 2305472/2019
- Decision date
- 15 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish Members
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Mr A Peart, Ms J Clewlow
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr R Owen (Non-legal Adviser) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal unanimously held that the claim of failure to make reasonable adjustments succeeded. The adjustments identified in the judgment were to allow the Claimant to complete an extended probationary period and to facilitate provision of an Access to Work Programme, or an equivalent arrangement.
The Tribunal also unanimously upheld the claim of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability. The unfavourable treatment identified in the written judgment was the Claimant's dismissal.
The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No separate remedy award is recorded in the written judgment extract.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments, namely to allow the Claimant to complete the extended probationary period and facilitate provision of an Access to Work Programme (or equivalent). | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability; the unfavourable treatment identified was dismissal. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.