Case 2305473/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Mehta v Cpk Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2305473/2019
- Decision date
- 9 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Siddall Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Mehta
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment on the papers, with no response received from the respondent. Employment Judge Siddall Date recorded that the respondent, Cpk Limited, had made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages. The tribunal awarded Mr M Mehta £980 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also awarded £240 gross for annual leave that had accrued but remained untaken. The total sum awarded to the claimant was £1,220 gross. The judgment does not set out any separate reasoning beyond the Rule 21 findings and the awards made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal recorded that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages and awarded £980. | Upheld | — | £980 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal awarded £240 gross for annual leave that had accrued but was untaken. | Upheld | — | £240 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,220
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.