Case 2305481/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Stacey Easton v The Clock Tower Gym — 2020
- Case reference
- 2305481/2019
- Decision date
- 15 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Stacey Easton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment because the respondent did not present a response within the stipulated time. The tribunal recorded that Mrs Stacey Easton had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and it awarded damages of £150.00 on that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages. It ordered payment of £1,182.26 on that claim, expressly noting that this figure took account of £1,000 already paid by the respondent to the claimant on 17 December 2019. The total payable to the claimant was recorded as £1,332.26.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £150.00. | Upheld | — | £150 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and awarded £1,182.26, taking account of £1,000 paid by the respondent on 17 December 2019. | Upheld | — | £1,182 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,332
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.