Case 2305496/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Olugboyega Awonuga v Inrenos 2 Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2305496/2021
- Decision date
- 2 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Krepski Representation
- Venue
- London South via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Olugboyega Awonuga
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant worked for Inrenos 2 Ltd from July 2021 to October 2021 running two fitness clubs on an annual salary of £35,000. After he emailed on 8 October 2021 saying he wished to resign and proposed 22 October 2021 as his final day, Mr Malik told him by phone that he should work only one week's notice. The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence about the call and found that, although he used the phrase "Why are you talking shit?", that was a one-off instance of swearing in a difficult conversation and was misconduct rather than gross misconduct.
On that basis, the tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to notice and that dismissal without notice was a breach of contract. It found he was entitled to one week's notice and awarded damages of £673.07 gross for the wrongful dismissal / notice pay claim. The tribunal contrasted the facts with Wilson v Racher rather than Pepper v Webb when assessing whether the conduct justified summary dismissal.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had deducted £600.45 from the claimant's final salary for alleged unreturned property. The deductions were made up of £397.75 for 37 missing fobs at £10.75 each, £73.37 for uniform items, and £129.33 for a laptop. It rejected the respondent's case on the fobs and uniform, finding the claimant was not in possession of them and that the stock control system was not robust enough to support the deductions.
As to the laptop, the tribunal accepted that it had been returned and rejected the invitation to read into the handbook term a broader rule that returned property in an unsatisfactory condition could be treated as never returned. It therefore held that all of the challenged deductions were unauthorised and ordered repayment of the full £600.45 gross. The bottom-line award was £1,273.52 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Plead as wrongful dismissal/notice pay. The tribunal found the claimant's use of obscene language was misconduct but not gross misconduct, so he remained entitled to one week's notice and the dismissal without notice was a breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £673 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent deducted wages for alleged missing fobs, uniform items, and a laptop. The tribunal found the fobs and uniform were not shown to be in the claimant's possession or responsibility, and the laptop had been returned, so the deductions were unauthorised. | Upheld | — | £600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,274
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 13(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Wilson v Racher [1974] I.C.R. 428
- Pepper v Webb [1969] 1 W.L.R. 514
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.