Case 2305513/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Gemma Miles v Shaw Healthcare Ltd and 2 others — 2023
- Case reference
- 2305513/2021
- Decision date
- 17 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Krepski Representation
- Venue
- London South via CVP
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Gemma Miles
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment records that Gemma Miles was a disabled person within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 at the time of the matters giving rise to the claims, by reason of her depression. It also records a separate finding that she was not a disabled person by virtue of long COVID.
No substantive liability decision, remedy decision, or split of any award is set out in the extracted text. The document is limited to these disability-status findings and a note that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written record only contains findings on disability status: the claimant was disabled by reason of depression at the material time, and was not disabled by virtue of long COVID. It does not record the substantive outcome of any discrimination claim. | Other | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.