Case 2305549/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Thomas v David Lloyd Clubs Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2305549/2024
- Decision date
- 6 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harley Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Thomas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing, the tribunal considered whether the claimant was a disabled person at the relevant times for the purposes of section 6 Equality Act 2010. The conditions identified in the judgment were poor short-term memory and impaired concentration.
The tribunal found that, at the relevant times, the claimant was not a disabled person as defined by section 6 Equality Act 2010. The written record states that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would only be provided if requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary hearing judgment records that the claimant was not a disabled person as defined by section 6 Equality Act 2010 at the relevant times. The written judgment does not expressly dismiss the whole claim. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.