Case 2305589/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Cerisola v Hartley Group Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2305589/2024
- Decision date
- 20 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hart Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Cerisola
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant brought claims for redundancy pay, notice pay (breach of contract), and unlawful deduction of wages following the termination of her employment on 19 February 2024. The hearing was held in person at London South on 20 January 2025 before Employment Judge Hart sitting alone, with the Claimant representing herself and the Respondent not in attendance.
The Tribunal upheld all three claims. It ordered the Respondent to pay £2,884.00 in respect of redundancy pay, £1,559.08 net in respect of 4 weeks' notice pay, and £935.42 net in respect of 12 working days of unpaid wages between 1 and 19 February 2024.
Reasons were given orally; written reasons were not provided in the published judgment. The published judgment does not state an explicit aggregate; the sum of the individual awards is £5,378.50.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy pay of £2,884.00 arising out of termination on 19 February 2024. | Upheld | — | £2,884 |
| Breach of contract | 4 weeks' notice pay of £1,559.08 net. | Upheld | — | £1,559 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | 12 days of unpaid wages between 1 February and 19 February 2024 totalling £935.42 net. | Upheld | — | £935 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,379
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.