Case 2305591/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Wells v J D Wetherspoon plc — 2022
- Case reference
- 2305591/2021
- Decision date
- 4 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Wells
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim after giving the claimant an opportunity, by letter dated 2 August 2022, to make representations or request a hearing on why strike-out should not occur. The stated reasons for possible strike-out were failure to comply with the tribunal's order dated 9 February 2022 and failure actively to pursue the claim.
The claimant did not provide written representations, did not provide sufficient representations, or did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. As a consequence, the hearings listed for 3 October 2023 and 6 February 2024 were vacated.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The strike-out judgment refers only to 'the claim' and does not separately identify individual causes of action. This claim type is taken from the case listing context rather than expressly stated in the judgment text. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The strike-out judgment refers only to 'the claim' and does not separately identify individual causes of action. This claim type is taken from the case listing context rather than expressly stated in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The strike-out judgment refers only to 'the claim' and does not separately identify individual causes of action. This claim type is taken from the case listing context rather than expressly stated in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The strike-out judgment refers only to 'the claim' and does not separately identify individual causes of action. This claim type is taken from the case listing context rather than expressly stated in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.