Case 2305640/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Richel Parker Macmillan v 4Life Healthcare Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2305640/2021
- Decision date
- 6 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McCann Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Richel Parker Macmillan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent in which Miss Richel Parker Macmillan brought a claim against 4Life Healthcare Services Limited for outstanding holiday pay under Regulations 14 and 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The judgment states that the claim succeeded by consent.
By agreement between the parties, the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant compensation of £3,408.34. The order required payment within 14 days of the date of the judgment, which was 6 July 2022.
The judgment does not record any contested findings of fact or any separate liability reasoning beyond the parties' agreement. It also does not identify any additional remedies, tribunal tests, or discrimination issues.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal recorded that the claim for outstanding holiday pay under Regulations 14 and 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 succeeded by consent, and the respondent was ordered to pay £3,408.34. | Upheld | — | £3,408 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,408
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,408
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.