Case 2305641/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Johnson v Jgw&d Ltd Trading as Ian Dunn Woodwork & Design — 2020
- Case reference
- 2305641/2019
- Decision date
- 23 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge HYDE Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Johnson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Hyde found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. The tribunal said the deductions related to the balance of unpaid wages due to Mr J Johnson on termination of employment, and it ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £1,308.75, as claimed in the particulars of claim.
The tribunal also ordered the respondent to pay £390 by way of a preparation time order. The hearing listed for 30 June 2020 was cancelled. No other claims, findings, or legal tests were recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of the balance of unpaid wages due on termination and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,308.75, as claimed in the particulars of claim. A separate preparation time order of £390 was also made. | Upheld | — | £1,309 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,699
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.