Case 2305649/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Otuonye v Hawthorne Trust Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2305649/2023
- Decision date
- 17 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Representation
- Venue
- Croydon via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O Otuonye
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place at Croydon via CVP on 17 March 2025 before Employment Judge Wright. The claimant, Mr O Otuonye, did not attend and did not provide written representations. The respondent, Hawthorne Trust Ltd, was represented by Ms S McIntosh, consultant, and had not had any communication from the claimant.
The tribunal recorded that the respondent's application under Rule 47 to dismiss the claim because of the claimant's non-attendance was successful. The claims, which had been consolidated on 4 July 2024, were therefore dismissed. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not state the underlying cause of action. It records that the consolidated claims in case numbers 2305649/2023 and 2306432/2023 were dismissed under Rule 47 after the claimant did not attend and did not provide written representations. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The extracted judgment does not state the underlying cause of action. It records that the consolidated claims in case numbers 2305649/2023 and 2306432/2023 were dismissed under Rule 47 after the claimant did not attend and did not provide written representations. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.