Case 2305681/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Christine Aslett v Adaptive Modules Ltd (in administration) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2305681/2021
- Decision date
- 7 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Christine Aslett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Ms Christine Aslett's claim against Adaptive Modules Ltd (in administration). It recorded that, by letter dated 27 September 2023, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal held that the claim should be struck out. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the underlying merits of the claim or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 because the claimant was given an opportunity by letter dated 27 September 2023 to make representations or request a hearing about non-pursuit, but did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.