Case 2305685/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Grey Miss A Allin v Roost Restaurant Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2305685/2020
- Decision date
- 21 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McLaren Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Grey Miss A Allin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment covers case numbers 2305685/2020 and 2305686/2020 brought by Miss R Grey and Miss A Allin against Roost Restaurant Limited. The extracted text does not identify the substantive claim type; the only substantive order recorded is that the claim was struck out.
The tribunal stated that the respondent company had been dissolved and that the claimant had not successfully applied to have it restored to the Register of Companies. It also recorded that, on 20 October 2022, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued, but no acceptable reason was given.
On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The decision was approved by Employment Judge McLaren Date on 21 October 2025, and no monetary remedy was awarded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted text does not state the substantive claim type. The judgment covers case numbers 2305685/2020 and 2305686/2020 and records that the claim was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.