Case 2305703/2021 · Employment Tribunal
For the v In person Mr Charity : HR Consultant — 2023
- Case reference
- 2305703/2021
- Decision date
- 25 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge N Cox Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard remotely at London South before Employment Judge N Cox sitting alone on 17 and 18 November 2022. The claimant, Craig Custance, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr Charity, described as an HR Consultant.
The tribunal determined that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim was not well founded and dismissed it. The written record does not set out detailed reasons for that conclusion, and it records that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The decision note also states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days, indicating that the published record is limited to the outcome rather than a fuller reasoning judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal stated that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim was not well founded and dismissed it. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and written reasons were not provided in the written record. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.