Case 2305737/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Lowry v Fleet Retail Packaging Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2305737/2023
- Decision date
- 28 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sudra
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Lowry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was an Employment Tribunal strike-out judgment in Mr D Lowry v Fleet Retail Packaging Limited. The only claim identified in the decision was unfair dismissal. By letter dated 16 March 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out on the basis that he had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 12 January 2024 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 2 April 2024 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because the claimant had not complied with the order dated 12 January 2024 and had not actively pursued the claim. A letter dated 16 March 2024 gave an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing, but none sufficient were made. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.