Case 2305745/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms G Ellis v Build Recruitment — 2024
- Case reference
- 2305745/2023
- Decision date
- 20 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Evans Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms G Ellis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs G Ellis brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against Build Recruitment. The tribunal dealt only with whether the unfair dismissal claim could proceed. It assumed, for the purposes of the decision, that employment began on 3 September 2021 and ended on 25 August 2023, but on that basis the claimant still had less than two years' service.
The tribunal noted that sections 92(7) and 97(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 add the statutory minimum notice period to employment for the purpose of the two-year service calculation. It accepted that the notice period in this case was seven days, which would extend the end date only to 1 September 2023. Even on that basis, the claimant still did not satisfy the two-year qualifying period required by section 108 ERA 1996.
In her response to the tribunal's show-cause request, the claimant did not identify any circumstances that would disapply the two-year service requirement. The tribunal rejected her reference to a failure to follow "protocols" as a basis for avoiding the statutory bar, noting that such matters do not make the dismissal of an employee with less than two years' service unfair for the purpose of bringing an unfair dismissal claim.
Accordingly, the tribunal held that the unfair dismissal complaint had no reasonable prospect of success and struck it out under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure. The judgment states that any complaint for breach of contract or unauthorised deductions from wages was unaffected by this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out under Rule 37 because the claimant had insufficient service to bring an unfair dismissal complaint. The tribunal assumed the employment dates in the claim form were correct and held that, even adding the seven-day statutory minimum notice period, the claimant would still not reach two years' service. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996
- ss.92(7) and 97(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Rule 37 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.