Case 2305758/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H. Mohamed v Modern Cooking Solutions Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2305758/2021
- Decision date
- 24 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Carney
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H. Mohamed
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr H. Mohamed brought a complaint described in the judgment as an unauthorised deduction from wages. The tribunal recorded that the claim against James Howland was dismissed upon withdrawal and amended the respondent name to Modern Cooking Solutions Ltd.
The tribunal upheld the unauthorised deduction complaint. It ordered the respondent to pay £693.00 gross, described in the judgment as £612.20 net, for unpaid wages and accrued unpaid holiday pay. The judgment does not separate that amount between the wage and holiday pay elements.
The case was heard by Employment Judge Carney sitting alone at London South Employment Tribunal by CVP on 23 March 2022, and the judgment was dated 24 March 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment upheld the complaint described as an unauthorised deduction from wages. The order recorded £693.00 gross and £612.20 net for unpaid wages and accrued unpaid holiday pay, but did not split the award between heads. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £693
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.