Case 2305769/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Mehmet Bagbozan v Chic Look Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2305769/2023
- Decision date
- 8 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Evans Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Mehmet Bagbozan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found the holiday pay complaint well-founded. It held that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay the claimant for holidays accrued but not taken when his employment ended, and ordered payment of GBP 436.15.
The tribunal also found the breach of contract complaint well-founded. It held that the respondent failed to pay amounts shown on the claimant's wage slips and due for July and August 2022, and awarded GBP 912.37 as damages for breach of contract.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment describes the complaint as holiday pay and an unauthorised deduction from wages for accrued but untaken holiday. | Upheld | — | £436 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the respondent was in breach of contract by failing to pay amounts shown on the claimant's wage slips for July and August 2022. | Upheld | — | £912 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,349
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.