Case 2305779/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Millsom v Simyra Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 2305779/2024
- Decision date
- 31 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ramsden Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Millsom
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London South by CVP on 24 January 2025 before Employment Judge Ramsden. The Respondent, Simyra Limited (in voluntary liquidation), did not attend. The Tribunal changed the Respondent's name to reflect the liquidation status and gave oral reasons at the hearing; written reasons were not provided in the written record.
The Tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded. It held that the Respondent had made deductions in respect of work performed in March 2024 in the sum of £1,086.72 net and in April 2024 in the sum of £1,634.61 gross, and ordered both sums to be paid to the Claimant.
The Tribunal also found the wrongful dismissal complaint well-founded and ordered damages of £6,538.46 gross. In addition, it upheld the complaint that the Respondent had failed to pay compensation for holiday accrued but not taken on termination of employment, and ordered £2,288.46 gross.
The written judgment records that the Claimant is responsible for any income tax and employee National Insurance contributions on sums paid under the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages for work performed in March 2024 (£1,086.72 net) and April 2024 (£1,634.61 gross), and ordered those sums to be paid. | Upheld | — | £2,721 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The Tribunal found the wrongful dismissal complaint well-founded and ordered £6,538.46 gross by way of damages. | Upheld | — | £6,538 |
| Holiday pay | The Tribunal found the claim for payment for accrued but untaken holiday on termination well-founded and ordered £2,288.46 gross by way of damages. | Upheld | — | £2,288 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,548
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.