Case 2305780/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr V Srajbr v Simyra Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2026
- Case reference
- 2305780/2024
- Decision date
- 4 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Evans REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr V Srajbr
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Evans, sitting alone at London South by CVP on 4 March 2026, determined the case in the absence of both parties. The respondent's name was amended to Simyra Limited (in voluntary liquidation), and the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy was removed as a respondent on the basis they appeared to have been wrongly included.
The Tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded, holding that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant for 10.75 days worked between 1 March 2024 and 5 April 2024, and ordered payment of £4,548.07 gross. The breach of contract complaint relating to notice pay was also well-founded; the claimant had a one month notice period and was awarded £9,166.66 in damages, calculated on gross pay to reflect likely treatment as Post Employment Notice Pay.
The holiday pay complaint was likewise well-founded, the Tribunal finding the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction by failing to pay for 7 days of accrued but untaken holiday on termination, and awarded £2,961.53. No written reasons were provided with the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found unauthorised deductions for 10.75 days worked but not paid between 1 March 2024 and 5 April 2024. | Upheld | — | £4,548 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay for one month notice period, calculated on gross pay to reflect likely tax treatment as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £9,167 |
| Holiday pay | Judgment characterises the holiday pay complaint as an unauthorised deduction from wages for 7 days of accrued but untaken holiday at termination. | Upheld | — | £2,962 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found unauthorised deductions for 10.75 days worked but not paid between 1 March 2024 and 5 April 2024. | Upheld | — | £4,548 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay for one month notice period, calculated on gross pay to reflect likely tax treatment as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £9,167 |
| Holiday pay | Judgment characterises the holiday pay complaint as an unauthorised deduction from wages for 7 days of accrued but untaken holiday at termination. | Upheld | — | £2,962 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,676
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.