Case 2305786/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Tumbridge v Ixion Holdings (Contracts) Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2305786/2020
- Decision date
- 2 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Tumbridge
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing in London South by CVP on 2 March 2022 before Employment Judge Self. The Claimant's application to amend the claim to add unfair dismissal and victimisation was refused.
The tribunal struck out the age discrimination claims as having no reasonable prospects of success under Rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Rules. The disability discrimination claims were dismissed upon withdrawal.
The tribunal also recorded that, after determining that the Claimant was seeking compensation for breach of contract and that the matter was sufficiently pleaded, that issue would be listed for a final hearing on 16 June 2022 before an Employment Judge sitting alone. No remedy was awarded in this preliminary decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The age discrimination claims were struck out as having no reasonable prospects of success under Rule 37(1)(a) at a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Self. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | The disability discrimination claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(a) no reasonable prospects of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.