Case 2305813/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Harber v The Intrinsic Care Group Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 2305813/2023
- Decision date
- 10 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Harber
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that the Respondent, The Intrinsic Care Group Limited, contravened the Equality Act 2010 in respect of claims of direct disability discrimination and discrimination arising from disability brought by Ms L Harber. The hearing took place by video at London South on 10 February 2026 before Employment Judge Corrigan sitting alone. The Respondent had not entered a response, and counsel for the Respondent appeared only in relation to an application to adjourn.
The Respondent was ordered to pay compensation totalling £16,732.06. This comprised financial loss of £4,145.89 (made up of two weeks' loss at £704.62 per week, 3% pension loss for two weeks of £42.28, and an ongoing weekly loss of £103.63 over 26 weeks in the claimant's new role), an injury to feelings award of £10,000, and interest of £2,586.17. No further pension loss was awarded.
Interest was calculated as simple interest at 8% per annum. For the injury to feelings award, interest of £2,141.82 ran from the date of discrimination (9 June 2023) to the date of judgment (10 February 2026), a period of 978 days. For the financial loss award, interest of £444.35 ran from the midpoint of that period (9 October 2024) to 10 February 2026, a period of 489 days. Written reasons were not provided with the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination under the Equality Act 2010; upheld together with the s.15 claim. The judgment does not split the award between the two disability claims. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination under the Equality Act 2010; upheld together with the s.15 claim. The judgment does not split the award between the two disability claims. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability (s.15 Equality Act 2010); upheld together with the direct discrimination claim. The judgment does not split the award between the two disability claims. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability (s.15 Equality Act 2010); upheld together with the direct discrimination claim. The judgment does not split the award between the two disability claims. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,732
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £4,146
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.