Case 2305814/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. B. Krishnan v Nellsar Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2305814/2023
- Decision date
- 7 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T.R. Smith
- Venue
- London South via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. B. Krishnan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case concerned a preliminary judgment on strike out and deposit issues. The claimant’s complaint of victimisation under section 27 Equality Act 2010 was struck out under Employment Tribunal rule 37(1)(a) because the tribunal found it had no reasonable prospect of success.
The tribunal also considered the claimant’s complaint of wrongful dismissal. It declined to strike that complaint out under rule 37(1)(a) and declined to order a deposit under rule 39. The judgment does not determine the merits of the wrongful dismissal complaint; it records only that the claim was allowed to proceed at that stage.
No monetary award was made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | Struck out under Employment Tribunal rule 37(1)(a) because it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal declined to strike out this complaint under rule 37(1)(a) and declined to order a deposit under order 39; the merits were not determined in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Employment Tribunal rule 37(1)(a)
- order 39
- section 27 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.