Case 2305843/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Louise Barber v Michael Wipfler — 2022
- Case reference
- 2305843/2021
- Decision date
- 24 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Louise Barber
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike out judgment under rule 37. By letter dated 03/05/2022, the Tribunal gave Louise Barber an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
By email dated 11/05/2022 from the claimant's legal representative, the claimant indicated that she did not object to the claim being struck out. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim.
The judgment records that the hearing fixed for 01/09/2022 would not take place. No remedy was awarded and no substantive determination of the underlying claim was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the claim was struck out under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued. By email dated 11/05/2022, the claimant's legal representative said she did not object to the claim being struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.