Case 2305870/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Nazeem Thomas v HCA International Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2305870/2021
- Decision date
- 13 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Nazeem Thomas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed by HCA International Ltd as a Resident Medical Officer from 14 December 2009 until 16 September 2021. He brought complaints including disability discrimination, unfair dismissal, and holiday and notice pay. At this public preliminary hearing the respondent applied to strike out the work-related Equality Act claims as out of time, while not challenging the Tribunal's ability to hear the dismissal claims.
The Tribunal found that the work claims did not form part of a continuing state of affairs. It accepted that the alleged work events ended well before the in-time date and concluded that the claimant had conflated the decline in his health with matters capable of connecting separate alleged acts.
The Tribunal also decided that it was not just and equitable to extend time. It noted the length of delay, the lack of cogent reasons for the delay, the claimant's awareness of reasonable adjustments issues, and the prejudice to the respondent in having to address older allegations. The Tribunal therefore held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the work claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The preliminary judgment decided that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear the claimant's Equality Act work claims because they were presented out of time. The dismissal claims, including unfair dismissal and holiday and notice pay, were not challenged in this application and were not adjudicated in this judgment. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- continuing course of conduct
- just and equitable extension of time
- Owusu
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.