Case 2305893/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Khan v Counter Security Services Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2305893/2021
- Decision date
- 11 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Siddall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Khan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment, entered because no Response had been received from the Respondent. Employment Judge Siddall therefore decided the case on the papers and made awards in favour of Mr W Khan against Counter Security Services Limited.
The tribunal found that the Respondent had made unlawful deductions from wages and awarded Mr Khan £1,323 net for the period from 23 September 2021 to 2 October 2021. It also found a breach of contract in relation to four weeks' notice pay and awarded £3,528 net for that claim.
In addition, the tribunal awarded £1,058.40 net for six days' annual leave accrued but not taken at the date of termination. The total sum awarded was £5,909.40 net.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as net unlawful deductions from wages for the period 23 September 2021 to 2 October 2021. | Upheld | — | £1,323 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as net damages for four weeks' notice pay. | Upheld | — | £3,528 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded as net pay for six days' annual leave accrued but not taken as at termination. | Upheld | — | £1,058 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,909
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.