Case 2305896/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Scott v Alpha Coatings Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2305896/2023
- Decision date
- 9 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beckett Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Scott
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a remedy judgment in Mrs S Scott v Alpha Coatings Ltd. The written record states that the respondent must pay the claimant £16,489.25. The award is broken down as a basic award of £3,858, a compensatory award of £12,281.25, and £350 for loss of statutory rights. The judgment also records that recoupment does not apply.
The extracted text does not set out the tribunal's liability reasoning in writing. It records that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons will not be provided unless requested within 14 days. On the available record, the outcome is reflected here as an upheld unfair dismissal claim with the remedy figures recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Remedy judgment only. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons will be provided unless requested. | Upheld | — | £16,489 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,489
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £3,858
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £12,281
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.