Case 2305919/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Christopher Amos v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 2305919/2023
- Decision date
- 13 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Christopher Amos
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent (Royal Mail Group Limited) had applied on 19 December 2025 for the claim to be struck out. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 13 January 2026 inviting representations or a request for a hearing on whether the claim should be struck out for non-compliance with the Tribunal's Order of 31 July 2025 and for not being actively pursued.
The claimant did not respond. Regional Employment Judge Khalil concluded on 11 February 2026 that a fair trial was not possible on the listed dates and that it was proportionate under the overriding objective to strike the claim out. The hearing scheduled for 16-19 February 2026 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim against Royal Mail Group Limited struck out for non-compliance with a Tribunal Order dated 31 July 2025 and for not being actively pursued. The hearing fixed for 16-19 February 2026 was vacated. The judgment does not specify the underlying claim type. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.