Case 2305930/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Bebbington v Civil Rail Solution Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2305930/2023
- Decision date
- 21 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dyal Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Bebbington
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy consent, the tribunal recorded that the claim for breach of contract for failure to pay employer's pension contributions was not compromised by the settlement agreement. That claim succeeded in the sum claimed of £66.24.
The tribunal held that the settlement agreement was valid and not voidable. All complaints in the claim form other than the pension-contribution breach of contract claim were found to have been compromised by the settlement agreement and were struck out under rule 37 as having no reasonable prospect of success.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for failure to pay employer's pension contributions succeeded by consent in the sum claimed. | Upheld | — | £66 |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment states that all complaints in the claim form except breach of contract in respect of employer's pension contributions were compromised by the settlement agreement and struck out under rule 37. | Struck out | Religion or belief | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that all complaints in the claim form except breach of contract in respect of employer's pension contributions were compromised by the settlement agreement and struck out under rule 37. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that all complaints in the claim form except breach of contract in respect of employer's pension contributions were compromised by the settlement agreement and struck out under rule 37. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that all complaints in the claim form except breach of contract in respect of employer's pension contributions were compromised by the settlement agreement and struck out under rule 37. | Struck out | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £66
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.