Case 2305978/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Pietrusza v Mr P and Mrs S Scott — 2021
- Case reference
- 2305978/2020
- Decision date
- 6 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Pietrusza
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss S Pietrusza brought complaints against Mr P and Mrs S Scott for unauthorised deductions from wages, said to relate to arrears of wages and accrued but untaken annual leave, and a separate claim for damages for breach of contract concerning entitlement to notice. Sitting alone, Employment Judge Tsamados held that the complaints were not well founded.
The judgment states that the entire claim was dismissed. No liability findings were made in the claimant's favour and no monetary award was recorded. The decision does not set out any separate remedy calculation or split the claims into distinct compensation components.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint was framed as unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of arrears of wages and accrued but untaken annual leave. The tribunal held it was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claim was for damages for breach of contract in respect of entitlement to notice. The tribunal held it was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.