Case 2305978/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Young v Adeel Kayani – Faircroft and Meadows trading as Monarch College — 2022
- Case reference
- 2305978/2021
- Decision date
- 8 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Young
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 23 December 2021. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Khalil Date determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On the claimant's unopposed case, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages for 3 working days in September 2021, had not paid contractual travel expenses for June and July 2021, and had not paid holiday entitlement of 8.5 days. It ordered gross payments of £294.63, £301.70, and £834.78 respectively, making a total award of £1,431.11 gross. The judgment also recorded that the claimant is responsible for any tax or national insurance due to HMRC, and the hearing listed for 23 August 2022 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions from wages for 3 working days in September 2021. | Upheld | — | £295 |
| Other | Unpaid contractual travel expenses for June and July 2021. | Upheld | — | £302 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday entitlement of 8.5 days. | Upheld | — | £835 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,431
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.