Case 2305992/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M F Awan v Pearl Hotel (Slough) Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2305992/2021
- Decision date
- 5 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Wright
- Venue
- London South via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M F Awan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge D Wright heard the case at London South via CVP on 3 January 2023, sitting alone. The claimant was represented in person with an Urdu translator; the respondent was represented by counsel.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal claim because it was out of time. It also dismissed the claimant's race discrimination claim because it was out of time. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent.
No monetary award was made. The judgment contains no separate remedy assessment because both claims were disposed of on limitation grounds.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim was out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Dismissed because the tribunal found the race discrimination claim was out of time. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.