Case 2306010/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Rebbeca Delaney v Lindfield Christian Care Home — 2024
- Case reference
- 2306010/2021
- Decision date
- 19 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lumby
- Panel members
- Mrs A Williams, Dr C Whitehouse
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Rebbeca Delaney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningSitting at London South by CVP on 11 to 14 November 2024, the tribunal, chaired by Employment Judge Lumby with Mrs A Williams and Dr C Whitehouse, found that Rebbeca Delaney had been unfairly dismissed by Lindfield Christian Care Home. The tribunal stated that the unfair dismissal complaint was well-founded and awarded a basic award of £1,469.96 and a compensatory award of £2,677.27.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the complaint of unfair dismissal well-founded and awarded a basic award of £1,469.96 and a compensatory award of £2,677.27. | Upheld | — | £4,147 |
| Disability discrimination | The complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,147
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,470
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,677
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.