Case 2306028/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Beckford v Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 2306028/2021
- Decision date
- 4 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Beckford
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims against Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust arising from her employment, including a claim described by the tribunal as unfair constructive dismissal, unlawful deduction of wages, and unpaid holiday pay.
The tribunal dismissed each claim. The judgment states that the claim for unfair constructive dismissal, the claim for unlawful deduction of wages, and the claim for unpaid holiday pay were each not well-founded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes this as a claim for unfair constructive dismissal and states it was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states the unlawful deduction of wages claim was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states the unpaid holiday pay claim was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.