Case 2306128/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Zhou C1 Mr J Jarrett C2 Mr J Mockfort C3 v Perfect Pint Pub Co Limited (in liquidation) R1 Stonegate Pub Co Limited R2 — 2025
- Case reference
- 2306128/2024
- Decision date
- 23 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Representation
- Venue
- Croydon via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Zhou C1 Mr J Jarrett C2 Mr J Mockfort C3
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing, the Tribunal removed the second respondent, Stonegate Pub Co Limited, as a party to the claim in accordance with Rule 35(2). The claimants did not attend and were not represented; R2 was represented by a solicitor.
The Tribunal recorded that C3/Mr Mockfort's claim against R1 had already been rejected on 28/8/2024, and dismissed his claim because R2 was no longer a party to the proceedings. R2's costs application against all three claimants succeeded, with costs summarily assessed at £3,462.50 plus VAT, payable by the claimants to R2.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that C3/Mr Mockfort's claim against R1 had been rejected on 28/8/2024 and that his claim was dismissed because R2 was no longer a party. The judgment does not identify the specific pleaded claim type in this operative ruling. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,463
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 35(2)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.