Case 2306131/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Kawooya v Yarrow Housing Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2306131/2024
- Decision date
- 26 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heath
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Kawooya
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 17 June 2025, the Tribunal gave Mr D Kawooya an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated basis was that the claim was scandalous or vexatious and had no reasonable prospect of success because it was a duplicate of case 2223944/2024, in which judgment had already been entered for the Respondent on 13 December 2024.
Mr Kawooya did not make written representations, did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 2 and 3 July 2025 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim was struck out because the Tribunal found it was a duplicate of case 2223944/2024, in which judgment had been entered for the Respondent on 13 December 2024. The claimant did not make representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter of 17 June 2025. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.