Case 2306137/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Tony Thomas v Kingston and Richmond NHS Foundation Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 2306137/2023
- Decision date
- 10 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Liz Ord
- Venue
- Croydon
- Panel members
- J Cook, R Singh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Tony Thomas
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Tony Thomas complained of direct disability discrimination arising from his bilateral mixed hearing loss. The tribunal found that the respondent became aware of the hearing loss at different points: for Ms Eduardo from 24 January 2023, for Ms Kelly at the dismissal hearing on 7 June 2023 when she saw the OH referral papers, and for Ms Shade at the appeal hearing on 3 August 2023. The tribunal accepted that the claimant had not disclosed the OH report to the Trust before the appeal, although the appeal process did include later hearing evidence from June 2023 and the NMC material sent on 4 July 2023.
The tribunal accepted the respondent's evidence that the dismissal decision was based on capability concerns, not hearing loss. It found the claimant had struggled to meet the required standards for practice as a nurse across a number of competencies, including medication administration, communication, personal development, escalation, time management and prioritisation. It held that only the communication issue was likely to have been affected by the combination of English language and hearing loss; the other failed competencies were not shown to be connected to disability.
On the three acts complained of, the tribunal held that the appeal dismissal, the failure to offer an alternative role, and the NMC referral all occurred, but that none was shown to be because of disability. It found that the decision not to offer an alternative role was driven by the visa restriction and the Trust's view that redeployment would not be appropriate after an earlier move. It found that the NMC referral was made because of competency concerns and that the Trust had no power to withdraw it after referral. Comparing the claimant with a hypothetical internationally educated nurse in materially similar circumstances but without hearing loss, the tribunal concluded that such a person would have been treated the same. The complaint of direct disability discrimination was therefore dismissed in full.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The only complaint determined in the judgment was direct disability discrimination. The tribunal held the claimant had not proved a prima facie case that the respondent's rejection of the appeal, failure to offer an alternative role, or referral to the NMC was because of disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13 Equality Act 2010
- s.23 Equality Act 2010
- s.136 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.