24 Eco Limited v Mr J Tilford Dack — 2025

Case reference: 2306146/2024
Decision date: 14 February 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Harrington REPRESENTATION

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

24 Eco Limited

Respondent

Mr J Tilford Dack

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At the London South CVP hearing on 14 February 2025, Employment Judge Harrington recorded that neither party was in attendance. The written judgment states that the claim brought by 24 Eco Limited against Mr J Tilford Dack was not well founded and was dismissed pursuant to Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.

The judgment does not set out the underlying factual findings or any separate remedy assessment. It also states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested at the hearing or by written request within 14 days of the sending of the written record. No monetary award was recorded.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	The written judgment gives no substantive reasons beyond stating that the claim was not well founded and dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.	Dismissed	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.