Case 2306153/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 2306153/2020
- Decision date
- 22 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Andrews Date
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard by Employment Judge Andrews sitting alone on 22 September 2021. The claimant, Miss J Vedd, appeared in person and the respondent, Lookers plc, was represented by counsel. No lay members sat on the tribunal.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claimant did not have the necessary continuous service to bring the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unpaid wages claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Dismissed as out of time; the tribunal was not satisfied that it was just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Race discrimination | Dismissed as out of time; the tribunal was not satisfied that it was just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed as out of time; the tribunal was not satisfied that it was just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.